Posterous'ing with RolyMo

Video: CubeStormer II robot beats Rubik's Cube speed record (Wired UK)

Video: CubeStormer II robot beats Rubik's Cube speed record

The ARM-powered, Lego-constructed CubeStormer II robot has set a Guinness World Record for the fastest solve of a Rubik's Cube, in Wired.co.uk's offices in London this morning.

The robot, in the presence of the editor-in-chief of Guiness World Records, shaved a massive 58.73 seconds off the previous world record of 64 seconds, which was set two years ago. The time to beat now stands at 5.270 seconds.

The robot's creators are Mike Dobson and David Gilday. They were originally competitors for the world record, but teamed up to combine their respective strengths. Gilday said: "We were both inspired by seeing other robots solving cubes on the internet. I was building a fairly fast robot called SpeedCuber, and Mike had one called CubeStormer I. Mike's strength's are in the Lego, in the construction, and mine are more in the software, so I was finding it really difficult to make mine go any faster, and Mike wanted a bit of help with the software. Instead of competing we thought it'd be better to team up and work together on CubeStormer II."

The robot is built from four Lego Mindstorm NXT kits, which are controlled by a custom-made Android app running on a  Samsung Galaxy S II. The bot takes a photo of each side, then computes the most efficient way to rotate to the parts so that each side shows just one colour. That solution is specifically optimised for the method that the robot uses to grip the cube. Gilday told Wired.co.uk: "There are some official rules about how the cube is scrambled, involving a computer program to generate a random [starting] position".

The fastest human solver is an Australian named Feliks Zemdegs, who tackled the cube in an impressive 5.66 seconds. He got to study the cube beforehand, however, whereas the robot includes examination time in its solving record.

The next step for the creators is to work on the robot's mechanics. Gilday told Wired.co.uk: "I believe the current human world record works out at about nine turns of the cube per second, and CubeStormer II is allegedly five or six, so the mechanics of CubeStormer are actually quite a lot slower than humans. The reason that it's so fast is because of the solution that's calculated." If cube's physical construction can only cope with nine moves per seconds, that might be the limiting factor, says Gilday. 

Dobson added: "I think the biggest restriction is that it's made out of Lego -- you can only get so much power out of a Lego motor. We are pushing it to the absolute limit to achieve this. Maybe moving forward, if Lego produce bigger motors, we will get faster."

We produced a short documentary of CubeStormer II's successes this morning, which you can view at the top of this page.

This is just brilliant.
1. Amazing to see a robot do it.
2. To see that the robot is made of lego
3. And its controlled by a mobile phone.

Way cool.

Convicted RFK assassin Sirhan Sirhan seeks prison release - CNN.com

Convicted RFK assassin Sirhan Sirhan seeks prison release

By Michael Martinez, CNN
November 27, 2011 -- Updated 0326 GMT (1126 HKT)
Sirhan Sirhan is taken into custody after the fatal shooting of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
Sirhan Sirhan is taken into custody after the fatal shooting of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Sirhan Bishara Sirhan is now serving a life sentence for killing RFK
  • Robert F. Kennedy was vying for the 1968 Democratic presidential nomination
  • Defense lawyers say recently discovered evidence shows a second gunman
  • Sirhan was hypno-programmed as a diversion for real assassin, his attorneys say

Los Angeles (CNN) -- Sirhan Sirhan, convicted of the 1968 assassination of presidential candidate Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, should be freed from prison or granted a new trial based on "formidable evidence" asserting his innocence and "horrendous violations" of his rights, defense attorneys said in federal court papers filed this week.

In a U.S. District Court brief, Sirhan's lawyers also say that an expert analysis of recently uncovered evidence shows two guns were fired in the assassination and that Sirhan's revolver was not the gun that shot Kennedy.

Attorneys William F. Pepper and Laurie D. Dusek also allege that fraud was committed in Sirhan's 1969 trial when the court allowed a substitute bullet to be admitted as evidence for a real bullet removed from Kennedy's neck.

The attorneys further assert that Sirhan was hypno-programmed to be a diversion for the real assassin and allege that Sirhan would be easily blamed for the assassination because he is an Arab. Sirhan, 67, is a Christian Palestinian born in Jerusalem whose parents brought him and his siblings to America in the 1950s.

Sirhan "was an involuntary participant in the crimes being committed because he was subjected to sophisticated hypno programming and memory implantation techniques which rendered him unable to consciously control his thoughts and actions at the time the crimes were being committed," court papers said.

The California Attorney General's office declined to comment Saturday on Sirhan's court filings, said spokeswoman Lynda Gledhill.

Court papers filed by Sirhan's attorneys say the state "refuses to acknowledge that hypno programming/mind control is not fiction but reality and has been used for years by the U.S. military, Central Intelligence Agency and other covert organizations.

"Though the practices of hypno programming/mind control is hardly new, the public has been shielded from the darker side of the practice. The average person is unaware that hypnosis can and is used to induct antisocial conduct in humans," Sirhan's court filings say.

Pepper and Dusek represented Sirhan earlier this year in his unsuccessful request for parole from Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga, California, 200 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. He is serving a life sentence.

Sirhan was convicted of killing Kennedy and wounding five other people during the June 5, 1968, shooting inside the kitchen service pantry of the former Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.

Three bullets struck Kennedy's body while a fourth bullet passed harmlessly through the shoulder of his suit coat. Kennedy, the most seriously wounded of the six victims, died the next day. The other five people survived their wounds.

The substitute bullet was introduced in the trial as the actual bullet removed from Kennedy's neck and alleged to have been matched to Sirhan's gun, Pepper said.

Pepper and Dusek are requesting a hearing to present dramatic new findings that they say show a kitchen crossfire in the hotel.

An analysis of a recently uncovered audiotape of the assassination shows that in addition to the eight gunshots fired by Sirhan's Iver-Johnson handgun, five other shots were fired by a second gun from the opposite direction, Sirhan's attorneys said.

The sound recording "clearly showed that 13 shots were fired in the pantry, and Sirhan's gun had only eight shots, so it definitely means there was a second shooter," Pepper told CNN.

The tape was made 40 feet away from the crime scene by freelance newspaper reporter Stanislaw Pruszynski and is the only known recording of the gunshots fired in Robert Kennedy's assassination. The recording was uncovered in 2004 by CNN's Brad Johnson, who had it independently examined by two experts, Spence Whitehead and Philip Van Praag. They concluded, individually, that more than eight shots were captured in the tape.

Watch Johnson's 2009 CNN "Backstory"report on the experts' separate findings.

In their court filings, Pepper and Dusek are focusing on Van Praag's analysis. Van Praag concludes that the Pruszynski recording is authentic and reveals that, over a five-second period in the pantry, two guns fired 13 shots, exceeding the capacity of the eight-shot Iver-Johnson Cadet -- the only gun that Sirhan possessed and had no opportunity to reload.

Van Praag rules out the possibility that any of the 13 shots were echoes, ricochets or non-gunshot sounds. He also finds that some of the shots were fired too rapidly, at intervals too close together for all the shots to have come from Sirhan's inexpensive handgun. Van Praag further concludes that the five shots fired opposite the direction of Sirhan's eight shots displayed a "frequency anomaly" indicating the second gun's make and model were different from Sirhan's weapon.

Pepper said that witnesses reported Sirhan was standing several feet in front of Kennedy and firing nearly horizontally while the medical evidence showed Kennedy's body and clothing were struck by four bullets fired point-blank from behind the Senator at steep upward angles.

Pepper said witnesses reported that bystanders grabbed Sirhan immediately after he fired his first two shots and that they had his firing arm pinned against a steam table, forcing Sirhan to fire his gun's remaining six bullets away from Kennedy, thus striking other people instead.

For decades following the 1968 assassination, Sirhan had claimed he could not remember the Kennedy shooting. Pepper and Dusek argue this is because he was "hypno-programmed" to fire his gun in the pantry and to then forget the shooting, his programming and those who had programmed him.

In 2008, Pepper hired a Harvard University memory expert who says he got the imprisoned Sirhan to recall the Kennedy shooting for the first time.

That expert is Daniel Brown, an associate clinical professor in psychology at Harvard Medical School who submitted a statement to the parole board after interviewing Sirhan for 60 hours over a three-year period. Brown says Sirhan now remembers that when he fired his shots in the pantry he believed he was at a gun range and shooting at circular targets, according to Pepper.

Brown believes Sirhan was programmed to do this so as to cause a distraction in the pantry, allowing a second gunman to secretly shoot Kennedy from behind, according to Sirhan's attorneys. Brown is described in Sirhan's court papers as "one of the world's foremost experts in hypno programming."

Brown says Sirhan now remembers hearing loud sounds he describes as "the thunderclap of other bullets" being fired by another gun in the pantry, the defense attorneys said. Brown says Sirhan also recalls seeing flashes in front of him that he associates with gunfire inside the pantry but not coming from his own weapon, according to Pepper.

Pepper accused both prosecutors and Sirhan's lead attorney, Grant Cooper, who has since died, of misconduct in the 1969 trial. At that time, Cooper was under federal indictment for illegally possessing grand jury minutes in an unrelated case, but the indictment was dropped after Sirhan's sentencing, Pepper said.

"The state suppressed, destroyed and withheld a great deal of evidence," Pepper said in an interview Saturday. Sirhan's "counsel provided totally ineffective assistance and collaborated with the prosecution in violation of his 6th Amendment rights.

"The prosecution told the judge in chambers that we do not have foundation for some of our ballistics evidence, and the defense counsel immediately jumped in and said, don't worry about that, we will stipulate that all of the ballistics evidence is what you say it is," Pepper said.

Los Angeles County prosecutors couldn't immediately comment Saturday, a spokeswoman said.

Said Pepper: "This is one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice imaginable, and because it relates to the assassination of a man who would likely have been president of the United States, the feeling of sadness is irrepressible in these circumstances."

Pepper said he personally knew Kennedy and his family, and ran his campaign in the heavily Republican Westchester County in New York when Kennedy, a Democrat, successfully ran for the U.S. Senate in 1964.

Sirhan never became a U.S. citizen, so if he were released from prison, he would be deemed an illegal immigrant and likely be deported to Jordan, where he has extended family, Pepper said.

In 1968, the 42-year-old Kennedy, younger brother of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy, was a leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination against Vice President Hubert Humphrey and Sen. Eugene McCarthy.

On the night of his assassination, Kennedy had just appeared on live television in an Ambassador Hotel ballroom, where he had claimed victory over McCarthy in the California primary election. Moments later, he was fatally wounded in the hotel service pantry while on his way to a press conference set for a small banquet room just beyond the pantry. The shooting in the pantry was not captured by any cameras.

At Sirhan's 1969 trial, prosecutors argued Sirhan killed Kennedy because of statements the New York senator made about the United States sending fighter jets to aid Israel.

But in the court papers filed this week, Sirhan's attorneys dismissed that allegation as a "most speculative motive," without any sworn statements for substantiation.

Sirhan was the only person arrested in Robert Kennedy's assassination.

CNN's Brad Johnson contributed to this report.

Wow. I am not surprised after watch Derren Brown prove that he could hypnotise an individual, turn them into a sharp shooter and then instruct them to kill someone (in the case of the programme they set him up to shoot Stephen Fry with blank rounds)

BBC News - Actor James Earl Jones receives Oscar in London

13 November 2011 Last updated at 12:36

Share this page

Actor James Earl Jones receives Oscar in London

James Earl Jones (right) with Sir Ben Kingsley Jones accepted his Oscar in front of the audience at the Wyndhams Theatre, London

Actor James Earl Jones has received an honorary Oscar on the London stage, to the surprise of his matinee audience.

Jones, currently starring opposite Vanessa Redgrave in Driving Miss Daisy - said he was "plain gobsmacked" as he accepted the award.

The 80-year-old was presented with his Oscar on stage by Sir Ben Kingsley.

Jones, whose film credits include Patriot Games and The Hunt for Red October, remains best known as the voice of Darth Vader in Star Wars.

The honour formed part of the 3rd annual Governors Awards, which also saw chat show queen Oprah Winfrey and make-up artist Dick Smith receive honorary awards.

Jones was due to receive his Oscar in person but decided he did not want to interrupt his run in the London play. Instead, he accepted it via video link.

In Los Angeles, Winfrey received the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award for her charity work, including the Oprah Winfrey Foundation and a Leadership Academy for Girls, which opened in South Africa in 2007.

Oprah, 57, credited producer Quincy Jones who spotted her on a talk show in Chicago and went on to cast her in The Color Purple - for which she won an Oscar nomination - saying he was "the only reason I am here tonight".

"I never imagined myself receiving an Oscar, certainly not for doing what I believe is a part of my calling, a part of my being."

Oprah Winfrey John Travolta and Maria Shriver were among those who paid tribute to Winfrey at the LA ceremony

Smith, known in the industry as "the godfather of make-up", was also given an honorary Oscar.

Smith won an Oscar in 1984 for his work on Amadeus, and also worked on The Exorcist, Taxi Driver and The Deer Hunter.

Actress Linda Blair, whom he transformed into a head-spinning demon in The Exorcist, paid tribute to Smith, but added: "For me, it was not as much fun as I think it was for Dick."

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences said the honorary awards were given to individuals for "extraordinary distinction in lifetime achievement, exceptional contributions to the state of motion picture arts and sciences, or for outstanding service to the Academy".

Opening the ceremony, Academy president Tom Sherak made only a passing reference to what has been a troubled week at the Academy, asking: "How was your week?" to a ripple of laughter.

Earlier this week, Eddie Murphy stepped down as host from the 2012 Academy Awards ceremony, following the resignation of producer Brett Ratner.

On Thursday, it was announced that Billy Crystal would replace Murphy, with Brian Grazer taking over as producer.

About time too.

BBC News - Realising the high-speed wire-free dream

11 November 2011 Last updated at 01:39

Share this page

Realising the high-speed wire-free dream

By Jane Wakefield Technology reporter
Cables Gadget fans often end up owning a spaghetti junction of wires

Imagine pulling up outside a petrol station and being able to instantly download an HD movie in less time than it takes to fill the car with fuel.

Or at home, wirelessly connecting together your TV, tablet, PC and mobile phone and being able to shunt around huge amounts of data between them without long waits.

A California laboratory has been testing a new technology that promises to turn these scenarios into reality.

It is called Wireless Gigabit - and the Santa Clara lab recently put so-called WiGig devices through their paces to check they were interoperable.

"The event was very successful. Participant companies were excited about their implementation of the WiGig specifications," Dr Ali Sadri, president of the Wireless Gigabit Alliance, told the BBC.

It is another step along the road for the high-speed wireless standard which was created in May 2009.

People testing WiGig devices The standard was put through its paces at a PlugFest event in the US

It operates in the unlicensed 60GHz spectrum band, which has little interference, meaning it can offer speeds far higher than traditional wi-fi - up to 7Gbps (gigabits per second).

Last year it was ratified by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE).

"This is a revolution in communication. It offers tools that customers never had before," Dr Sadri told the BBC.

"It is a game-changer in wireless and in a couple of years who knows how many new applications there will be for it," he added.

That promise has helped attract several high profile backers including Intel, Microsoft, Cisco and Nokia.

The speeds offered by WiGig mean it can shift data in a way that wi-fi can only dream of.

"Wi-fi networks are very busy and over-crowded and cannot deal with bandwith-heavy applications," said Carlos Cordeiro, a senior member of the IEEE.

However, there is has one major drawback. WiGig's range is limited to between 10 to 15 metres - a factor that may prevent it being crowned the next-generation wireless standard.

"Its much shorter range means it isn't so much a replacement for wi-fi as for cable," said Mark Hung, an analyst with research firm Gartner.

Thinner devices

Even so, the appeal of a cable-free future is obvious. Our desire for fast data downloads has caused countless living room corners to resemble spaghetti wire junctions.

As devices continue to swap more data, more often with a rising number of other products, there is a growing need for faster wireless transfers.

Steve Jobs showing off a MacBook Air Can devices get any thinner?

"Interconnectivity of devices in the home will be the key to utilising the ever faster connections we can get... people want easy ways of getting HD video from their camcorder onto their TV, and also onto their tablets," said Andrew Ferguson, co-founder of broadband news site ThinkBroadband.

Another reason to want a cable-free future is the desire for ever thinner devices.

When Steve Jobs pulled the new Macbook Air from a manila envelope in 2008 it seemed as if devices could not get much thinner.

Manufacturers have since competed to shave further millimetres off their laptops, but their need to build in power and cable ports has proved to be a constraining factor.

"To make devices look sexier the industry is keen to get rid of all connectors. Currently the thinness is limited only by the need to have these connectors," Mr Cordeiro said.

In the future ultra-thin port-free devices may become the standard.

"In terms of power there are wireless solutions already available," said Mr Cordeiro.

Adoption curve

WiGig is not the only wireless standard offering high-speed data transfers between devices.

Ultra-wideband is also designed to carry large amounts of bandwidth over short distances. But so far it has failed to catch on.

"There are no standards for it and the industry has not really adopted it," said Mr Cordeiro.

Meanwhile WiGig steams ahead.

Dr Sadri believes that the standard could become a commercial reality by the end of 2012.

But that does not mean you can throw away all your cables just yet.

"The adoption curve will be slower than for wi-fi because it will rely on a whole ecosystem, and that will take a while to put in place," said Mr Hung.

"At first we will see it in laptops and PCs and the peripherals that connect to them."

The Spy Who Liked Me - Forbes

This story appeared in the November 21 issue of Forbes magazine.

Sean Campbell and Scott Swigart of Cascade Insights

When a financial director at a privately held New York company received a friend request from an attractive blonde on Facebook, the recent divorcé eagerly accepted it. As they chatted over the course of a few days, his new friend mentioned the possibility of visiting him for New Year’s Eve and asked a few innocuous questions about his business, such as how much revenue his company had. He told her he couldn’t disclose that information, but a few days later, having grown more comfortable with her, he admitted that the figure was $6.5 million.

The curious stranger wasn’t a ­single-looking-to-mingle. “She” was a (male) security consultant for a company called Cyberoam in Bangalore, India, that is finding out how easy it is to exploit social media for ­corporate espionage. The loose-lipped director’s New York firm was one of 20 companies that Cyberoam targeted over a six-month period, stalking ­employees on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook to find leaks of sensitive ­information. The Cyberoam spies were able to predict a bankruptcy filing for a ­Singapore company, based on employees’ tweets about the company’s ­belt-tightening measures and its vice president of ­operations announcing on LinkedIn that he was job-searching.

“Employees are sharing information that can be used in very different ways than they intended,” says Cyberoam Vice President Abhilash Sonawane, who is not disclosing the names of the companies his firm monitored. “This was not a fact-finding mission. We just wanted to demonstrate to our clients how important it is to have a social media policy in place advising employees about what they shouldn’t be disclosing online.”

August Jackson, a market intelligence analyst at Ernst Young (formerly at Verizon), says he wants his co-workers to talk up their work, just not “specifically what they’re working on today.” But he’s more than happy to take advantage of those making this mistake at other companies. He steadfastly follows competitors’ executives and employees on Twitter and LinkedIn. “And I’m really happy that Google+ recently added a search function,” he adds.

If you’re not monitoring competitors’ activity on social media, you may be missing out on delicious tidbits. While creating a fake profile to friend competitors is generally viewed as unethical—
and potentially illegal—there are many other legitimate sources of information to be mined on the Web.

Sean Campbell and Scott Swigart of  Cascade Insights in Oregon City, Ore. conduct competitive intelligence searches in the technology sector. They often come across juicy info on employees’ LinkedIn pages: university students describing product features they worked on during summer internships (that haven’t yet been publicly disclosed); an AT&T sales representative’s boast that he worked with one of the company’s biggest Wi-Fi clients, volunteering that it was Nintendo’s $6 million account. Even senior executives slip up, as when Hewlett-Packard vice president of cloud services Scott McClellan outlined the details for HP’s planned cloud computing platform on his LinkedIn profile—while official reports were still extremely vague. Before he could delete the overshare, the news media picked up on it, and rivals Microsoft and Amazon got the lowdown.

Swigart was asked by a software company to get intelligence on its competitor Cloudera. He posed a few questions on Quora, a techie-heavy Q&A site, where he is clearly identified as a competitive intelligence specialist. To his surprise, one of the first respondents was an engineer from Cloudera eager to talk in detail about the projects he was working on. “I understand the impulse. He was trying to be active on social media and engage with the community there,” said Swigart. Unfortunately, it’s easy to forget that some may not have your best interests at heart.

Phil Britton, a senior manager of competitive intelligence at Best Buy, frowns upon the practice of spoofing another’s identity. “The same ethics apply online as offline. I wouldn’t walk into a competitor’s store and lie about who I work for. People shouldn’t create false fronts online.”

But people do. Last year Thomas Ryan, a consultant at Provide Security, invented a female white-hat hacker named Robin Sage, giving her accounts on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. He fabricated an impressive résumé for her, including an MIT graduate degree and stints at several intelligence agencies, and grabbed photos of a ­Lisbeth Salander-type from a pornography site after a Google image search for “Goth girl.”

Eeeeek. Just checking my linkedin contacts. I swear I had some people I have never heard of link to me and I accepted by mistake and slip of the hand.

iCloud vs. Wi-Fi Sync: Which does what? | Macworld

by Dan Frakes, Macworld.com   Nov 7, 2011 5:50 pm

Thanks to the combination of iTunes 10.5, iOS 5, and iCloud, you can sync data wirelessly with your iOS device. In fact, there are two ways to do so: iCloud syncing, which sends specific information to and from Apple’s iCloud servers over an Internet connection, and Wi-Fi Sync, which syncs your device with iTunes on your Mac via your local wireless network.

But there are notable differences between what gets synced using each method—some things are exclusively iCloud or Wi-Fi Sync, while other things can be synced via either method. And it’s important to note that Wi-Fi sync and iCloud sync aren’t mutually exclusive. You can, and mostly likely will, use both methods depending on the situation and your settings. Which is why it’s easy to get confused about the differences and similarities between the two.

Here’s a quick summary of the types of data handled by each, as well as when each type of data is copied or synced.

Wi-Fi sync

Wi-Fi syncing is identical to tethered (USB) sync—it syncs only data that resides on your Mac. You enable Wi-Fi sync, counterintuitively, by connecting your iOS device to your Mac via Apple’s USB-to-dock-connector cable, and then, in iTunes’s Summary screen for your device, checking the box to Sync With This Device Over Wi-Fi.

Wi-Fi syncing can sync the following types of data between your iOS device and iTunes. Note that, as with USB syncing, Wi-Fi syncing handles only those categories of data you’ve chosen in iTunes to sync to each device.

  • Music, video, apps, books, podcasts, audiobooks, ringtones, and iTunes U content you’ve purchased from Apple and downloaded to iTunes. This includes apps and media you’ve purchased on other iOS devices and downloaded to iTunes via automatic download.
  • Music, video, books, and other media you’ve ripped or otherwise manually added to iTunes.
  • Documents for individual iOS apps that use iTunes’s File Sharing feature.
  • Photos in iPhoto, in Aperture, or in folders on your Mac’s drive that you’ve opted, in iTunes, to sync to your iOS device.
  • Device backups (though only if you’ve opted for local backup instead of iCloud backup).
  • Contacts, calendars, bookmarks, and notes (though only if you’re syncing them locally, via iTunes’s Info screen for your device, rather than via iCloud or MobileMe)


You enable Wi-Fi syncing in iTunes.

Once you’ve enabled Wi-Fi syncing in iTunes, Wi-Fi sync happens automatically, once per day, when your iOS device is connected to power and on the same Wi-Fi network as the computer running iTunes. (If you unplug from power after the sync starts, the sync continues.) You’ll see a sync icon in the iOS device’s status bar during any sync—you can continue to use the device during the sync. You can also force a Wi-Fi sync—with or without power—any time you're on the same Wi-Fi network as your computer and iTunes is running: On your iOS device, go to Settings > General > iTunes Wi-Fi Sync > Sync Now; or on your Mac, select your device in the iTunes sidebar and then click Sync in the lower right corner of the Summary screen.

iCloud sync

Your iOS devices can also sync data wirelessly with iCloud, but iCloud syncing differs from Wi-Fi sync in significant ways. First and foremost, iCloud is the central storehouse of data, rather than your computer—once you've gotten your data into iCloud, your devices sync directly to it. In this way, iCloud is a lot like MobileMe syncing. But whereas MobileMe-to-iOS syncing handled only email accounts, contacts, calendars, bookmarks, and notes, iCloud also handles many of the same other types of data you can sync via iTunes. However, iCloud doesn’t actually sync every type of supported data—for some items, it simply makes media available for you to download.


You choose, in the iCloud screen of the Settings app, which types of data to sync.

The types of data iCloud can sync with your iOS devices include:

  • Contacts, bookmarks, calendars, and notes.
  • Photos you’ve uploaded to iCloud—from your iOS devices, or iPhoto or Aperture on your Mac—using Photo Stream.
  • Device backups—only if you’ve opted for iCloud backup instead of iTunes backup.
  • Documents and data stored in iCloud by iCloud-enabled apps.

There are also types of data iCloud doesn’t sync—it doesn’t upload them to iCloud from your device—but does make available for automatic, over-the-air downloading to your device:

  • Newly purchased music, apps, books, and (for Newsstand publications) periodical subscriptions—only if you’ve opted, in Settings > Store, to automatically download these types of data.

Finally, iCloud makes particular types of data available for manual downloading:

  • Music, apps, books, audiobooks, ringtones, and (in the U.S. only) TV shows you’ve purchased from Apple.
  • Via iTunes Match (Apple’s $25-per-year music-hosting and -download service), most music you’ve ripped or otherwise manually added via iTunes.

Unlike Wi-Fi syncing, iCloud syncs aren’t all-at-once events—different types of data are synced or downloaded at different times. The following list assumes your iOS device has an Internet connection:

  • Changes to contacts, calendars, and notes are pushed to your iOS device immediately after those changes are made on the iCloud.com website or are received by iCloud from another device.
  • New photos are pushed to your iOS device immediately after they’re added to Photo Stream.
  • Backups occur once a day when your device is connected to power (an AC or DC adapter, a computer’s USB port, or an external battery pack), has an active Wi-Fi connection, and is screen locked.
  • Changes to documents and data hosted by iCloud’s Documents in the Cloud feature are pushed immediately to your iOS device.
  • If you’ve enabled the setting (in Settings > Store) to automatically download music, apps, books, or publications, these items are pushed to your device immediately after they’re purchased on any other iOS device or in iTunes on your Mac. Note that “purchased” includes free downloads from Apple's media and app stores.
  • If you’re an iTunes Match subscriber, tracks and playlists you’ve uploaded to iCloud via iTunes Match are available for streaming playback in the Music app. You can also choose to manually download individual tracks to keep them on your iOS device for offline listening.

As noted above, depending on how you’ve configured iTunes and your iOS devices, you may use iCloud sync only for, say, your photos, documents, contacts, bookmarks, calendars, and notes, but use Wi-Fi sync for music, video, and backups. In fact, movies can be synced only via Wi-Fi from your computer; TV Shows can be downloaded via iCloud in the U.S., but must be synced with your computer elsewhere. And podcasts can’t be downloaded automatically via iCloud—you must manually download them from within the iTunes app or sync sync them via iTunes on your computer.

Macworld staff editor Serenity Caldwell contributed to this article.

BBC News - Trials to reduce fish discards could be expanded

7 November 2011 Last updated at 07:49

Share this page

Trials to reduce fish discards could be expanded

By Daniel Boettcher BBC News
Cod Initial findings from 15 vessels catching cod or sole in England show discards down to less than 1%

Trials to reduce discards from fishing vessels could be expanded as the government says initial results show they are working.

Boats in the trials with CCTV cameras have to keep all the fish they catch but are rewarded with extra quota.

Findings from 15 boats in England have seen discards of less than 1%. There are also similar trials in Scotland.

The industry says the trials should be seen as one possible solution but not used to justify a total ban.

Under the current rules limits apply to what boats land at the quay side, not to what they actually catch.

That means that if vessels reach their quota for a particular species or catch fish that are smaller than the legal limit they are discarded.

The latest trials to test a new approach began in April, building on previous work, with the fifteen vessels in England which have been taking part catching either cod or sole.

Under the "catch quota" trials boats have to keep and land all the fish of certain species, whatever size. The incentive is that they get a higher quota, but when they reach that limit they have to stop fishing altogether.

'Pleased'

The trials have been run by the Marine Management Organisation (MMO), on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

Julian Roberts, from the MMO, said the initial findings had been positive.

"We're very pleased with the results. The industry have engaged with this and they've demonstrated that they can fish without discarding any fish.

"They have demonstrated that the gear they are using can be selective and also they have caught very small quantities of undersized fish as well, so really everything they have landed has been a marketable catch," she said.

The footage from the CCTV cameras, fitted on the boats, is stored on data recorders which are later analysed on shore.

Andrew Pillar, from Interfish in Plymouth, has one of his vessels taking part in the trials.

"People's perception of discards is obviously very poor and the situation with the fishing industry is we want to move away from discarding fish that can provide a good meal and provide an economic return for the fishing industry," he said.

Sufficient incentives?
Mackerel catch in Cornwall, UK - file pic There are plans to expand the trials to include more vessels and more stocks

But while he is positive about results so far, like others in the industry he remains cautious.

"This project is some way towards a tool for helping to improve fisheries management but it is by no means a panacea across every fishery," he said.

While the trials have seen discards of less than 1%, there are still technical issues to improve on. For example the accuracy of catch estimates by the vessels and by on shore observers is variable.

The interim report also says that there is a need to understand more about how the system would work in a mixed fishery.

While many in the industry welcome the trials as one of a number of potential ways of reducing discards, some have reservations about how widely the system might be applied and how quickly.

They also warn it should not be used to justify a total ban on discards.

The National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations (NFFO) argues that a wider catch quota system will only work if it is voluntary, if there are sufficient incentives and if each fishery is looked at on a case by case basis.

Fisheries Minister, Richard Benyon, said the findings will be used in negotiations over reforms to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).

He said: "The UK government is clear that the Common Fisheries Policy is broken and needs drastic reform.

"We came forward with a practical solution of counting what they catch not what they land. And now we've shown that it works," he said.

There are plans to expand the trials to include more vessels and more stocks. To do that the UK will have to get extra quota in annual negotiations which take place next month.

Awesome news

Here Comes Apple’s Real Thermonuclear War Against Google | Cult of Mac

Here Comes Apple’s Real Thermonuclear War Against Google

By Mike Elgan (1:11 pm, Nov 05)

Here Comes Apple’s Real Thermonuclear War Against Google

A few years ago, everything was peaceful in the Valley of Silicon. The relationship between Apple and Google was cozy and friendly. The two rising and dominant superpowers pursued compatible, non-overlapping businesses, for the most part, and helped each other fight mutual competitors like Microsoft, Amazon and others. Google’s founders worshiped Steve Jobs. Eric Schmidt was on the Apple board.

But then Google recklessly chose to attack Apple head-on with Android.

The future of Apple’s most profitable businesses will run iOS, including iPods, iPhones, iPads and probably laptop and desktop systems of the future — not to mention TV. Google’s decision to compete head-on with Apple for multi-touch platforms ended the alliance.

Steve Jobs took it personally, and told biographer Walter Isaacson that he was “willing to go thermonuclear war on this.”

But what did he mean by that?

Everyone assumes he meant lawsuits, which in fact Jobs mentioned in the context of this conflict. But that was merely the part already publicly disclosed. What Jobs did not reveal was the secret thermonuclear war to come.

I believe Apple is waging two wars against Google: One is a cold-war style proxy campaign via patent lawsuits.

But the other employs the nuclear option: The scorched-earth elimination of Google across all Apple platforms.

The Proxy Wars

In the context of Jobs’ thermonuclear war, he mentioned lawsuits. But you’ll notice that Apple isn’t suing Google itself.

Such a lawsuit would have little impact. Because Apple and Google are both American companies, a patent lawsuit against Google would mean the two companies would go to court in the US. This single case would drag on for years, while handset makers happily continued making Android devices knowing that deep-pocketed Google would, in a worst-case scenario, pay money or tweak Android in future versions to avoid specific infringements found by the courts.

Instead, Apple chose to fight via an endless series of proxy wars. So far, the company has gone after Android device makers Samsung, Motorola and HTC. Expect many more.

The message to Google’s hardware partners is: Go ahead and invest in the development of Android phones and tablets. But your investment may be squandered when we surprise you with lawsuits and other court actions in random countries at unpredictable times.

It’s called FUD, for “fear, uncertainty and doubt.” The calculation to make Android devices now includes the risk of lawsuits, injunctions, extra licensing fees to Apple and possible court orders to stop using Android.

So far, the proxy war hasn’t made a dent in the Android universe. But this is a long war, and the strategy could erode enthusiasm for Android by hardware makers in the long run.

The proxy war is Apple’s strategy for poisoning Google’s Android well. It’s war, but not thermonuclear war.

I believe the real thermonuclear option will be the near-total elimination of Google services on Apple platforms.

The Real Thermonuclear War

The real thermonuclear war will take place on the iOS platform itself, where I believe Apple will seek to replace the widespread use of Google services and apps with Apple ones.

Here are the bombs Apple has dropped or will drop in the near future:

Nuke #1: Siri to replace Google Search. Even Google’s Eric Schmidt has admitted recently that Siri is a threat to Google Search. And he’s right. In fact the ingrained habit of Googling things is already being replaced among some iPhone 4s users of just asking Siri for answers.

By default, some of those requests are handled by Wolfram-Alpha, and others by Google, the current default search engine for Siri. (You can request other search engines, and Siri will happily comply.)

Three things will turn the Siri hand-grenade into an atomic bomb: First, the use of Siri will become universal among iPhone users (right now, it’s just a fast-growing app for the minority of users with iPhone 4s phones).

Second, Apple will almost certainly roll Siri out to all platforms, enabling people with Macs and iPads to have their questions answered by Siri as an alternative to browser-based Google searches.

And third — and this is the big one — Apple will throw a switch, I believe, and make another search engine the default for Siri (and Safari).

Boom! No more Google Search.

Nuke #2: Find My Friends to replace Google Latitude

Location-based services like Latitude are pretty insignificant now, but important for the future of mobile social networking and location-based advertising and marketing. Apple has its Find My Friends app available as an option, but in the future I believe will bake it right into all platforms, and provide a strong disincentive to use Latitude.

Nuke #3: Yelp to replace Google Places

When Siri ranks restaurants for you, it uses Yelp, not Google Places. Had Apple’s and Google’s relationship remained strong, this probably wouldn’t have been the case.

Nuke #4: Apple’s maps to replace Google Maps

Apple recently bought a mapping company called C3. Apple had previously acquired mapping companies Placebase and Poly9. It seems pretty obvious that Apple intends to launch its own mapping service so it doesn’t have to keep using Google Maps, which is currently bundled on all iPhones and iPads.

Once Apple is ready to launch its own Maps-like service and application based on these three acquisitions, you can be sure they’ll drop Maps from iOS devices, and flip the switch on Siri’s default mapping service as well.

Nuke #5: iCloud to replace Google’s cloud

With iCloud so fully integrated with all of Apple’s devices and platforms, Apple users will be unlikely to have much need for Google’s many cloud services.

Nuke #6: iMessage to replace Google Gmail and Talk

iCloud integration on iOS devices will compel many current Gmail users to use Apple services for email. The same goes for Calendar and Contacts. The introduction of iCloud in iOS 5 makes synching with Gmail harder, and replacing Gmail easier.

After the bombs have been dropped and the dust has cleared, Google will find itself will barely any presence at all on Apple devices like Macs, iPads and iPhones. This represents literally hundreds of millions of users.

While Google will still have lots of users worldwide, they will suffer greatly from this because Apple users tend to be on the high end of the spectrum for ad targeting.

Steve Jobs threatened thermonuclear war. And I think Apple will deliver. But it will come not in the form of lawsuits, but on the near-total elimination of Google from Apple platforms.

Comment »

Subscribe to Cult of Mac

Share this article

About the author

mikelgan

Mike Elgan is a Silicon Valley-based columnist who writes about technology and culture. His work appears in a variety of publications, including Computerworld, Datamation, PC World, InfoWorld, MacWorld, ITWorld, CIO, the San Francisco Chronicle. Subscribe to Mike's e-mail newsletter, Mike's List, and follow him on Twitter, Facebook, Digg and elsewhere by visiting http://elgan.com.

Email the author| Read more posts by .

Posted in Android, Apple, iOS, News, Top stories |

Interesting perspective. I wonder what handset the writer uses? And can Google out squirm the maneuveres of Apple which they seem to currently. Google moves quite fast compared to Apple in programatical updates this might be due to QA stage. Would also be interested to see what percentage of mobile search reveues compared to desktop/laptops were for Google to see if Google cared. Although mobile is not going away anytime fast.

Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha | ZDNet

Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha

By Ken Hess | October 25, 2011, 11:40am PDT

Summary: Storing your App data to Apple’s iCloud is very convenient. A little too convenient maybe. Find out how to manage your iCloud backup data before you spend money on storage you don’t need.

I excitedly upgraded to iOS 5.0 the day it was first available and have been 90% satisfied with my decision to do so. There are a few issues with it, however. One is that you’ll find that some of your previously purchased Apps don’t work. Another is that a few of your settings weren’t kept or were replaced by newer versions that have been moved or renamed. But, the biggest ‘gotcha’ of all is,…wait for it,…iCloud.

Please don’t misunderstand me. I wanted iOS 5. I wanted iCloud. I couldn’t wait, in fact. And, this coming from the guy who takes a very conservative approach to support and personal computing. I’m never the first to jump onto a new version, new gadget or new service pack.

This time I did. And, I’m not sorry that I did, but I’d say proceed with caution if you haven’t made the trip yet.

During the iOS5 setup phase, you’re asked whether you want to use iCloud for backup, which also untethers you from iTunes for updates and backups. Of course, if you want to backup and restore from iTunes, you can choose not to use iCloud at any time.

I chose to use iCloud for my iPhone 4 and for my iPad. My reason was a simple one and one I would use again should the wizard reappear on another device: I don’t want to be tethered to iTunes or any particular computer. I don’t really like iTunes. I think that there are better delivery models available.

Cloud-based delivery models.

And, yes, I know that “Cloud” is a dirty word to many of you but to you I have to say, “Sorry” and “Get with the program.”

I digress. Back to my iCloud gotcha.

I had only used iCloud twice. Once for my iPhone 4 and once more for my iPad during the iOS 5 setup. But, a few days after the upgrade, I received a system message that my iCloud was almost full and that I need to purchase some space or I won’t be able to perform additional backups.

Wait, what?

But, I have only used iCloud once for each device.

Due to my suspicious nature, I smelled an Apple-scented scam afoot and so I investigated further.

Let me put your mind at ease before I go any further to say that there was no scam and there was no fault on Apple’s side nor mine. However, you should be aware of how your iCloud space is used. Apple’s iCloud storage App did exactly what it was supposed to do. The problem was that I just didn’t know how well it performed its assigned task: Backing up my wife’s videos to iCloud.

You see, my wife subscribes to some religious-oriented videocasts by Beth Moore. She’s purchased six or seven of the videocasts and each one consumes just over a half gig (GB) of space on the iPad. That’s no big deal for my 32GB model.

The problem was that I didn’t know that her video backup was causing my free 5.0 GB of iCloud space to be virtually useless to me.

Here’s how I solved the problem and how you can setup what does and does not get backed up to your iCloud account.

On your iDevice, open Settings, iCloud and then to Storage & Backup (scroll all the way down to see Storage & Backup). Check out your Total Storage (5.0 GB) and the amount available to you. Mine currently is 3.2 GB as you can see in Figure 1.

iCloud Storage Summary

Figure 1: iCloud Storage Summary

Tap Manage Storage to see how much space each of your iDevices uses. See Figure 2.

iCloud Storage Used per Device

Figure 2: iCloud Storage Used per Device

To see details about what is backed up on each iDevice, tap the device. Figure 3 shows some details of my iPhone’s backups.

Device-specific App Storage

Figure 3: Device-specific App Storage

You can see how much space each App uses and choose which App data to backup using this interface. To see all Apps, tap the Show All Apps selection at the bottom of the list (not shown). If you want to exclude a particular App’s data from future backups, slide its selector to the Off position. That App’s data will no longer be backed up to your iCloud account.

You also have the option of deleting your backup (option not shown in Figure 3). To do so, scroll down until you see the option Delete Backup and delete your backup from iCloud for this device.

Make your changes and allow your iCloud backup to proceed normally.

If you find that, at some future date, that you need more storage, you can purchase it “in App” as shown in Figures 1 and 2 above. Pricing for iCloud’s additional storage isn’t cheap. As you can see in Figure 4, it’s quite pricey but still less than Dropbox by comparison.

Additional iCloud Storage Pricing

Figure 4: Additional iCloud Storage Pricing

Hopefully, in the future, someone will develop an App that allows you to select your Cloud provider of choice for your iDevice backups.

Until then, you’ll have to manage this iCloud ‘gotcha’ on your own.

Do you use iCloud for your iPhone, iPad, iPod or other Apple devices? Why or why not?

Talk back and let me know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Kenneth 'Ken' Hess is a full-time Windows and Linux system administrator with over 15 years of experience with Mac, Linux, UNIX, and Windows systems in large multi-data center environments.

Disclosure

Ken Hess

My full-time employer is EDS (HP). I write as a freelancer for ZDNet. The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent EDS's, HP's, their subsidiaries or affiliates positions, strategies or opinions. I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Ken Hess

Kenneth 'Ken' Hess is a full-time Windows and Linux system administrator with over 15 years of experience with Mac, Linux, UNIX, and Windows systems in large multi-data center environments.

Ken writes on a variety of topics including interoperability, virtualization, data center operations, databases, and open source software. He has written and co-written books on Linux, databases, and virtualization. He currently writes a System Administration column for Linux Magazine and is a regular contributor to Linux User & Developer magazine, ServerWatch.com's Trends and InfoStor. He often contributes to other online and print publications as well.

His first computer was a Commodore VIC-20, which he purchased because William Shatner was in the commercials.

In his limited spare time, Ken enjoys painting, drawing, and flinging angry birds at fortified pigs.

Talkback Most Recent of 24 Talkback(s)

  • Not sure why Apple does not want your wife to keep videos off-iCloud count
    ... the same way as it happens with iTunes' music or applications.

    If the religious videos are bought from iTunes, then there is no expense for Apple to exclude their size the same way they exclude music and applications.

    Maybe in some iCloud update in the future Apple will resolve this annoyance. Then your wife would be able to store as many gigabytes of iTunes videos as possible without it being accounted as part of 5 GB iCloud space.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    DeRSSS
    about 4 days ago
  • Think Apple doesn't want to get sued by movie studios...
    @DeRSSS for which it still doesn't have licences to do what you describe... Jobs said in the iCloud presentation that they are working on it...
    ZDNet Gravatar
    doctorSpoc
    about 4 days ago
  • RE: Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha
    @doctorSpoc I just check, and Beth Moore has no videos on iTunes. As I thought, she did not purchase them through iTunes. Had she, she could download them/view them anytime without it taking from your cloud storage. Since apps get all the content in their documents backed up, that is what its getting backed up. Thanks for the tip - I intend to turn off video for all my video players - that content was loaded from my home machine anyway.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ebernet
    about 4 days ago
  • RE: Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha
    Clouds
    ???Get with the program.???....

    To this I say

    "All your Information are belong to us" -sincerely the US Govt.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    Bodazapha
    about 4 days ago
  • !!!Bodazapha From your keyboard to Gods workgroup!!!
    @Bodazapha <- Damned skippy! I have 6TB on my own local networks dedicated backup, with timed transfer to headless drones packing another 10TB, and each box on my wire has 2 TB for whatever the user wants, autosaving saving biz B/U, personal loading to mass storage is optional We all have different tastes in pron.
    "Get with the program?"
    How much coke you doing a day Ken?
    "It's Clouds Illussions you Install, there really are no clouds, at all" .
    Uh...ok archaic kewl term...Word up G.
    Meh.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Otis Driftwood
    about 3 days ago
  • Managing my iCloud settings is almost a full time job
    Going through every single application to configure their cloud storage options is quite the pain. I haven't even restored all my apps from the epic fail that was my iOS 5 upgrade.

    Still, I'm glad to have the option but you highlight a very important gotcha: iCloud doesn't "Just Work". It needs a lot of babysitting.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    toddybottom
    about 4 days ago
  • RE: Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha
    @toddybottom Either I did something wrong or something right - I have had no issues at all with the upgrade itself - no lost apps, no moved settings, no babysitting the iCloud. I notice the device itself runs a bit slower but that is the only difference thus far that I can see.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Pete "athynz" Athens
    about 4 days ago
  • RE: Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha
    @toddybottom - Although I can't speak of user installation issues with iOS5 since I didn't have any with either my iPhone4 or iPad1 (have not activated iCloud on either device), it seems to me that it did "just work". All my reading indicates the "epic failures" appear to be mis-information by Apple haters.

    If you want everything backed-up without thinking about it, just buy more storage and let 'er rip. If you want to pick and choose (babysit?), then pick and choose like any other backup app. Simple.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    Gr8Music
    about 3 days ago
  • RE: Avoiding the iCloud storage gotcha
    ???Get with the program.???

    Exactly. Why would you store anything on any local device? Get it all into the cloud, dude. Then you won't need iCloud or any other backup.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    aep528
    about 4 days ago
  • Because we live on planet earth
    @aep528
    Why not keep everything in the cloud? Because here on earth we have something called bandwidth caps! So, if I want to watch the last season of burn notice, I need them cached locally and downloaded via wifi or direct connection. The cloud is a great addition, but it is no replacement yet.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    DougPetrosky
    about 4 days ago

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Worth a read if you have multiple iDevices and are wanting to use the same iCloud account.

BBC News - Faster-than-light neutrino experiment to be run again

28 October 2011 Last updated at 08:51

Share this page

Faster-than-light neutrino experiment to be run again

By Paul Rincon Science editor, BBC News website
Gran Sasso sign The neutrinos are fired deep under the Italian Apennines to the Gran Sasso lab

Scientists who announced that sub-atomic particles might be able to travel faster than light are to rerun their experiment in a different way.

This will address criticisms and allow the physicists to shore up their analysis as much as possible before submitting it for publication.

Dr Sergio Bertolucci said it was vital not to "fool around" given the staggering implications of the result.

So they are doing all they can to rule out more pedestrian explanations.

Physicists working on the Opera experiment announced the perplexing findings last month.

Neutrinos sent through the ground from Cern (the home of the Large Hadron Collider) in Geneva toward the Gran Sasso laboratory 732km away in Italy seemed to show up a tiny fraction of a second earlier than light would have.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

It's like sending a series of loud and isolated clicks instead of a long blast on a horn”

End Quote Prof Matt Strassler Rutgers University

The speed of light is widely regarded as the Universe's ultimate velocity limit. Outlined first by James Clerk Maxwell and then by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity, much of modern physics relies on the idea that nothing can travel faster than light.

For many, the most comforting explanation is that some repeated "systematic error" has so far eluded the experimenters.

Since September, more than 80 scientific papers about the finding have been posted to the arXiv pre-print server. Most propose theoretical solutions for the observation; a few claim to find problems.

Dr Bertolucci, the director of research at Cern, told BBC News: "In the last few days we have started to send a different time structure of the beam to Gran Sasso.

"This will allow Opera to repeat the measurement, removing some of the possible systematics."

The neutrinos that emerge at Gran Sasso start off as a beam of proton particles at Cern. Through a series of complex interactions, neutrino particles are generated from this beam and stream through the Earth's crust to Italy.

Graphic of the Opera experiment

Originally, Cern fired the protons in a long pulse lasting 10 microseconds (10 millionths of a second).

The neutrinos showed up 60 nanoseconds (60 billionths of a second) earlier than light would have over the same distance.

However, the time measurement is not direct; the researchers cannot know how long it took an individual neutrino to travel from Switzerland to Italy.

Sergio Bertolucci (Cern) Cern's director of research says the new experimental design will be more efficient

Instead, the measurement must be performed statistically: the scientists superimpose the neutrinos' "arrival times" on the protons' "departure times", over and over again and taking an average.

But some physicists say that any wrong assumptions made when relating these data sets could produce a misleading result.

This should be addressed by the new measurements, in which protons are sent in a series of short bursts - lasting just one or two nanoseconds, thousands of times shorter - with a large gap (roughly 500 nanoseconds) in between each burst.

This system, says Dr Bertolucci, is more efficient: "For every neutrino event at Gran Sasso, you can connect it unambiguously with the batch of protons at Cern," he explained.

Clicking in

Physicist Matt Strassler, who raised concerns about the original methods, welcomed the new experimental design.

Writing on his blog, Prof Strassler, from Rutgers University in New Jersey, said: "It's like sending a series of loud and isolated clicks instead of a long blast on a horn; in the latter case you have to figure out exactly when the horn starts and stops, but in the former you just hear each click and then it's already over."

Albert Einstein in Pittsburgh on 28 December 1934 Einstein's relativity theory holds that nothing can exceed the speed of light

The re-jigged neutrino run will end in November, when Cern has to switch from accelerating protons to accelerating lead ions. Opera scientists hope to include these measurements in the manuscript they will submit for publication in a scientific journal.

One of the main challenges to the collaboration's work comes from Nobel laureate Sheldon Glashow and his Boston University colleague Andrew Cohen.

In a recent paper, the physicists argue that if neutrinos can travel faster than the speed of light, they would rapidly lose energy, depleting the beam of more energetic particles. This phenomenon was not seen by the Opera experiment.

Cross checks

Dr Bertolucci called this study "elegant", but added: "An experimentalist has to prove that a measurement is either right or wrong. If you interpret every new measurement with older theories, you will never get a new theory.

"More than a century ago, Michelson and Morley measured the speed of light in the direction Earth was moving and in the opposite direction. They found the speed was equal in both directions."

This result helped to spur the development of the radical new theory of special relativity.

"If they had interpreted it using classical, Newtonian theory they would never have published," said Dr Bertolucci.

Next year, teams working on two other Gran Sasso experiments - Borexino and Icarus - will begin independent cross-checks of Opera's results.

The US Minos experiment and Japan's T2K experiment will also test the observations. It is likely to be several months before they report back.

Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

I cannot wait to hear the results. Mind bending stuff

110
To Posterous, Love Metalab